The Ancient Alien Question Read online

  THE

  ANCIENT

  ALIEN

  QUESTION

  THE

  ANCIENT

  ALIEN

  QUESTION

  A New Inquiry Into the Existence, Evidence, and Influence of Ancient Visitors

  PHILIP COPPENS

  Copyright © 2012 by Philip Coppens

  All rights reserved under the Pan-American and International Copyright Conventions. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system now known or hereafter invented, without written permission from the publisher, The Career Press.

  THE ANCIENT ALIEN QUESTION

  EDITED AND TYPESET BY KARA KUMPEL

  Cover design by Howard Grossman/12E Design

  Printed in the U.S.A.

  Images on pages 86, 89, 91, 102, 104, 107, 131, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 157, 158, 159, 162, 186, 263, 280, and 281 are © Philip Coppens.

  Image on page 145 is © Erich von Däniken, used with permission.

  Images on pages 167 and 169 are © The Estate of Stan Hall, used with permission. [website]

  Image on page 180 is © Marsyas, made available as part of the Creative Commons License on Wikimedia.

  Image on page 183 is © Madman2001, made available as part of the Creative Commons License on Wikimedia. Image on page 191 is © Wikipedia.

  Image on page 205 is © Jon Rolls, used with permission.

  Images on pages 208 and 209 are © Hartwig Hausdorf, used with permission.

  Images on pages 232 and 238 are © NASA.

  Image on page 245 is © Christina Rutz, made available as part of the Creative Commons License on Wikimedia. Image on page 278 is from 1875 and © The Hearst Museum.

  To order this title, please call toll-free 1-800-CAREER-1 (NJ and Canada: 201-848-0310) to order using VISA or MasterCard, or for further information on books from Career Press.

  The Career Press, Inc.

  220 West Parkway, Unit 12

  Pompton Plains, NJ 07444

  www.careerpress.com

  www.newpagebooks.com

  Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

  Coppens, Filip.

  The ancient alien question : a new inquiry into the existence, evidence, and influence of ancient visitors / by Philip Coppens.

  p. cm.

  Includes bibliographical references (p.) and index.

  ISBN 978-1-60163-198-5 -- ISBN 978-1-60163-628-7 (ebook)

  1. Human-alien encounters. 2. Civilization, Ancient--Extraterrestrial influences.

  3. Unidentified flying objects--Religious aspects. 4. Life on other planets. 5. Extraterrestrial beings. I. Title.

  BF2050.C67 2012

  001.942--dc23

  2011027037

  Acknowledgments

  I have been posing the Ancient Alien Question for almost two decades now, and hundreds of people have joined me on my quest for an answer. I would particularly like to thank Erich von Däniken, Uli Dopatka, and Gene M. Phillips for inviting me, as a young man in my 20s, to air my side of the debate at a number of Ancient Astronaut Society World Conferences in the 1990s. Special thanks, of course, are due to Erich, as he is not only the pioneer in this subject, but also the man who kindly wrote the foreword for this book, which is truly a great honor and privilege. I thank Giorgio Tsoukalos for a friendship that began then, which has grown since, and especially for his unending devotion to the cause, however hard the going sometimes became.

  My drive to answer the Ancient Alien Question was reignited by the wonderful team at Prometheus Pictures, the producers of Ancient Aliens. Your professionalism is equal to none and every minute of filming was a joy (yes, David Silver, that includes the eight-hour wait for a replacement camera in Rennes-le-Château). However, I need to single out Kevin Burns for his commitment and vision, as well as Evan Goldstein, with whom my part of the story began.

  This book would not have come about without the vision of Michael Pye at New Page Books. You and the team at New Page are the engine that made this book come true.

  In my circle of friends, I would like to specifically thank: Paige Tucker; Jason Gossman; Sarah Symons; Mary Parent; Patrick Ruffino; Patrick Bernauw; Marc Borms; Chris Norman; Cris Winter; Gerard Lohan; Eileen, Cathy, and Janeth Hall; Debbie Nicastro; Herman Hegge; Dawn Molkenbur; Tobi and Gerda Dobler; Marianne Wilson; Theresa Byrne; Cynthia James and Carl Studna; Gail Heron Sterling; Geoff Potts; JoAnn Parks and MAX; Peter van Deursen and Anneke Koremans; Isobel Denham; Kelly Cole; Philippe Canal. Apart from being the best friends anyone could desire, you make life beautiful. By default, I will have forgotten some, and I sincerely apologize for that!

  I thank the research and devotion of the following authors and often friends: Robert Bauval; Graham Hancock; Greg Taylor; Wim Zitman and Hendrine; Sam Osmanagic and Sabina; John Major Jenkins; Geoff Stray; Hartwig Hausdorf; Robert and Olivia Temple; Mark Pilkington; Howard Crowhurst; Hugh Newman; Andy Collins; David Hatcher Childress and Jennifer; Jeremy Narby; Antoine Gigal; Ralph Ellis; Jack Sarfatti; Uri Geller; Joseph Davidovits; John Ritchie; Duncan Lunan.

  Special appreciation to the photographic skill of Rivelino, and the fantastic photo shoots in the streets and along the canals of Amsterdam.

  I would like to thank my thousands of Facebook friends and followers, who allow me to have a great virtual banter on a daily basis!

  Each and every member of the Coppens, Sonck, Harkey, and Smith family, though I need to specifically mention my parents; my brother, Tom, and his wife, Kathleen, and my nephews, Daan and Arne; Papa and Mama; as well as Patrick, Conor, and Shane.

  Finally, I thank Kathleen. It is best summed up by Giorgio, who in December 2009, when he saw me again after many years, heard me speak about you and to you on the phone and concluded that there was absolutely no doubt that I was totally in love. You changed my life, made me into a new man, and were a constant source of inspiration throughout the writing of this book, and will remain so. As fate would have it, the final paragraph of this manuscript was written on our anniversary. Semper.

  Philip Coppens

  May 29, 2011

  Contents

  Foreword by Erich von Däniken

  Introduction

  Chapter 1: One Small Question for Man, One Giant Question for Humankind

  Chapter 2: Ancient Alien Theories

  Chapter 3: Of Gods and Men

  Chapter 4: Old Buildings, New Techniques

  Chapter 5: A Brave New World

  Chapter 6: The Best Evidence

  Chapter 7: Alien DNA, Earthly Life

  Chapter 8: Evidence of Nonphysical Contact

  Conclusion

  Notes

  Bibliography

  Index

  About the Author

  Foreword

  By Erich von Däniken

  Dear reader,

  From 1953 until 1958, I was a student at the Collège St-Michel in the small Swiss town of Fribourg. There, among other things, we learned Old Greek and Latin. Time and again we had to translate texts from the Bible, the Old Testament, from one language to the other. I read in Genesis: “But when people started to multiply on the earth, and daughters were born, the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they took as their wives any they chose.”

  I was confused. What “sons of Gods”? My professor said that this referred to “fallen angels.” What “fallen angels”? I wondered. Later, we translated the words of the biblical prophet Ezekiel as he described seeing a vehicle come out of the clouds with a lot of noise. He described the wings of the vehicle, its wheels, and even its metal legs. My professor b
elieved that this referred to a vision, and that Ezekiel had described “God in his chariot.”

  Doubts gnawed at my beliefs, and, as a 17-year-old, I wanted to know whether other cultures in ancient times had similar descriptions to those of the Christian-Jewish tradition. So while my classmates were playing soccer, I sat in the university library and read...and read...and read. Soon I understood that many ancient human traditions contained similar reports to the stories in the Bible, only with other words and other heroes. Could one believe the texts?

  At that time I decided to take those texts that had been written in the first-person, as an eyewitness report, to be true. And there were many. Again and again I encountered descriptions of “gods” who drove around in the clouds, of beings who came down to earth with “smoke, fire, earthquakes, noise,” and selected people who had the privilege of being taken to “heaven” by the “gods.” There, these people experienced a training program. Even artificial insemination and changes in the genetic code were reported in the old books I read.

  At some point I realized that all these actions were not compatible with the traditional idea of the “Beloved God.” But when I replaced the word god with the word extraterrestrial, everything suddenly made sense.

  In 1965, I had my manuscript for Chariots of the Gods finished—but found no publisher. From 24 publishing houses, I got the usual rejection: Sorry...not suitable for our program...too unprofessional...and so on.

  At that time I was director of a first-class hotel in the Swiss ski resort of Davos. (I come from a restaurant family.) One of my guests, the chief editor of a German magazine, was friends with the head of the large German publishing house ECON, and he arranged a meeting for me. Chariots of the Gods thus found a publisher. In May 1968, the book was #1 on all German bestseller lists.

  I gave up my hotel career and devoted myself entirely to my new profession: researcher of ancient texts and searcher for clues in archaeological ruins. Chariots of the Gods was a provocative book that had more than 230 question marks. I had written the book not in a scientific form of writing, but in a popular one. It contained some errors (unavoidable for a young author). In the scientific literature it is no different: There, too, one finds errors in books that are 30 or 40 years old. After all, science is a living thing, and not a religion, in which one must simply believe. After Chariots of the Gods there followed a further 28 nonfiction books. I corrected old errors and misunderstandings in the new books. Today there is for me not the slightest doubt: Millennia ago, extraterrestrials visited the Earth. These visits became myths, legends—and also religions.

  We should set up new branches of science; for example, a “Central-American-Indology,” in which the links between the cultures of Central America and India are examined. Or a “New-Age-Philology,” in which old texts can be retranslated such that the religious “heaven of bliss” becomes “the universe” or—depending on the circumstances—“giant spaceship.” Perhaps a science of the “Chronology of the gods,” in which the unspeakably complicated information about the gods from antiquity would be investigated in the aim of finding a common denominator. The questions when and how often the aliens were here would also be a research objective of the “Chronology of the gods.”

  Our limited knowledge of reality is mostly based on the present—quite understandable, because we live in the “now” and not in “the day before yesterday.” What happened today, what makes headlines today, concerns us. What happened yesterday no longer interests us. This fatal short-sightedness robs us of the sense of historical events. We feel the presence of knowledge as a culmination of all knowledge from the past. We claim to be the best-informed society, and accordingly, all our ancestors knew much less than we do. However, this attitude makes us proud, it makes us rather contemptuously overlook the past. This is dangerous, because those who do not know history are doomed to repeat its mistakes. This backward attitude has led historians and archaeologists to believe little about our ancestors. The astonishing thing is the smoothness with which this fallacy is implemented in practice: If an old historian such as the Greek Herodotus, 2,500 years ago, says something that fits into our current knowledge, then that statement is happily placed on record. But if the same historian, often on the same page, makes a remark that does not suit us, we label it false without batting an eyelash, calling him a liar, an exaggerator; degrading him to the level of an ignorant person who has not understood anything.

  For example, the Egyptologists of our time copied from Herodotus that Pharaoh Menes (circa 2920 BC) diverted the Nile above Memphis. With closed eyes and ears is suppressed what the same Herodotus, 18 lines later in Volume 2 of his Histories, notes: “After Menes followed 330 kings, whose names the priests read aloud from a book.” The diversion of the Nile and the name “Menes” fit, but the 330 kings interfere. The same Herodotus, in chapters 141 and 142, also tells of his visit to Thebes (today’s Luxor). There the priests showed him 341 statues, and the high priest said to each statue a few words. After the visit, the chief priest assured Herodotus that these 341 statues represented a period of 11,340 years. At that time the gods had been on Earth in human form. What did we do with those 11,340 years? They are dislodged, swept off the table, reinterpreted as a misunderstanding, or read as “lunar years,” although in Egypt there never was a moon year and Herodotus nowhere used one.

  Around 300 BC, there lived in Egypt a high priest named Manetho. He was the “Scribe of the Holy Temple” and surfaces with the Greek historian Plutarch as a contemporary of the first Ptolemaic king (304–284 BC). To Manetho are attributed eight works, including a book on the history of Egypt and the so-called Book of Sothis, which includes the names and years of the reigns of the prehistoric kings, dating back to the time of the gods. Manetho wrote that the first ruler of Egypt was Hephaistos. Then follow Chronos, Osiris, Typhon (a brother of Osiris), and then Oros (also Horus), the son of Osiris and Isis. Manetho: “After the gods the family of the offspring of the gods reigned 1,255 years, and in turn other kings reigned 1,817 years. After which are 30 kings, Memphite, 1,790 years. After which there are others, Thinite, 10 kings, 350 years. And then the kingdom of the offspring of the gods, 5,813 years.”1

  The original writings of Manetho are no longer available. But the historian Julius Africanus and the Church father Eusebius (died AD 339), who, as Bishop of Caesarea and an early Christian chronicler, was received into the Church history, copied large parts of Manetho’s work. Here Eusebius expressly noted that the dates of Manetho were probably lunar years—which, added together, still account for more than 14,000 solar years.2

  Diodorus of Sicily, who lived in the first century BC, was the author of a 40-volume historical library, in which he reported in the first book that the old gods “had in Egypt alone, established many cities” that from the gods descendants had emerged, of which “some of them became King of Egypt.” People in that distant time were forerunners of Homo sapiens, or a primitive form that “only the gods had weaned...not to devour each other.”3 From the gods the people learned (according to Diodorus) the arts, mining, the manufacture of tools, the cultivation of the soil, and the production of wine. Also, language and writing came from these helpful celestial beings. Diodorus used sources that are not available to us anymore. He nevertheless knows exactly what he’s talking about, as in the 44th chapter he compares the Egyptian dates with his own visit to Egypt: “Over Egypt Gods and Heroes have ruled, not much less than 18,000 years, and the last divine king was Horus, son of Isis. Of human kings that have ruled the country by Moeris not much less than 5,000 years up to the 180th Olympiad, in which I came to Egypt myself.”4

  So goes the ancient literature. Worldwide. Always these “impossible numbers” are cited, which our historians and archaeologists do not want anything to do with. In a joint effort, we should go over the books and subject the knowledge of our primal ancestors to a new analysis. To that end, this work by Philip Coppens is an important and outstanding contribution.

  What
is it about the Ancient Alien Theory that is important for the human race? They were here, these aliens, thousands of years ago, and they promised to return. It is not only ancient cultures that knew the idea of a second coming, but also the modern, vibrant religions: Christians are waiting for Jesus, Muslims for the Mahadi, the Jewish community for the Messiah, and so on. Can every religion be correct? What if all of them are wrong?

  This “Shock of God,” as I call it, is preventable. We can prepare ourselves for the return of the extraterrestrials. All of this has nothing to do with a new religion. I will turn myself around in my grave if my ideas turn into a cult. It is not about belief—it is about testing. The facts are there.

  Yours sincerely,

  Erich von Däniken

  Introduction

  Have we been visited by extraterrestrial beings in the past? Did these “ancient aliens” contribute to the birth of human civilization? Do our ancient monuments contain evidence of their presence?

  In 1968, Swiss hotelier Erich von Däniken posed these key questions in his book, Chariots of the Gods, which sold more than 63 million copies, proving that millions of people in the Western world were open to the notion that we might have been visited by extraterrestrial beings. Now, 35 years on, there is still tremendous popular interest in this “Ancient Alien Question.” The television series Ancient Aliens is continuously rated as The History Channel’s most watched documentary. What was originally conceived as a two-hour special grew into a phenomenon that saw more seasons added, each with more shows than it had before.

  But despite media and public interest, the phrase ancient aliens remains taboo within the scientific community. Whether or not we were alone in the human adventure that was early civilization is a question that is still not answered, or even addressed. The closest topic explored by science is the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI), executed by a handful of radio astronomers, each one of whom continuously sees his budget challenged and then removed because it is perceived to be a niche discipline. Even so, SETI merely investigates whether there are extraterrestrial civilizations somewhere out there, in the depths of the universe. It is far less controversial than the Ancient Alien Question, about which science states that it knows that there were no alien interventions in our past. Is science right?